by Emmitt Barry, Worthy News Washington D.C. Bureau Chief
(Worthy News) – The Supreme Court on Monday handed President Donald Trump a major victory on executive authority, ruling that he may fire senior officials at powerful regulatory agencies over policy differences, while also preserving procedural limits in a separate case involving the Federal Reserve.
In a landmark decision, the justices upheld Trump’s removal of Democratic Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Slaughter, effectively overturning the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent that had limited a president’s ability to remove FTC commissioners. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that a president must be able to rely on officers who carry out executive power on his behalf.
However, the Court stopped short of giving the White House a complete victory. In a separate ruling, the justices allowed Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to remain in office for now, finding that Trump had not given her a meaningful opportunity to respond to allegations of mortgage-related misconduct before attempting to remove her “for cause.”
The twin rulings strengthen presidential control over much of the administrative state, including agencies Congress had long tried to shield from direct political pressure. At the same time, the Court signaled that the Federal Reserve remains in a distinct constitutional category because of its role in monetary policy and the need to preserve public confidence in the nation’s financial system.
Trump celebrated the FTC ruling as “historic,” calling it one of the most significant expansions of presidential power in a century. He dismissed the Federal Reserve setback as procedural and vowed to continue seeking Cook’s removal.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented in the FTC case, warning that the majority had moved the country closer to an “imperial presidency.” Supporters of the ruling, including America First Legal, said the decision restored a basic constitutional principle: officials exercising executive power must answer to the elected president.
Copyright 1999-2026 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
The following code is how the above article is generated with the Worthy Suite WordPress Plugin.
[worthy_plugins_news_story_body]This is how you display a story with an image.
Supreme Court Expands Presidential Firing Power, But Shields FED Official For Now
by Emmitt Barry, Worthy News Washington D.C. Bureau Chief
(Worthy News) – The Supreme Court on Monday handed President Donald Trump a major victory on executive authority, ruling that he may fire senior officials at powerful regulatory agencies over policy differences, while also preserving procedural limits in a separate case involving the Federal Reserve.
In a landmark decision, the justices upheld Trump’s removal of Democratic Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Slaughter, effectively overturning the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent that had limited a president’s ability to remove FTC commissioners. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that a president must be able to rely on officers who carry out executive power on his behalf.
However, the Court stopped short of giving the White House a complete victory. In a separate ruling, the justices allowed Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to remain in office for now, finding that Trump had not given her a meaningful opportunity to respond to allegations of mortgage-related misconduct before attempting to remove her “for cause.”
The twin rulings strengthen presidential control over much of the administrative state, including agencies Congress had long tried to shield from direct political pressure. At the same time, the Court signaled that the Federal Reserve remains in a distinct constitutional category because of its role in monetary policy and the need to preserve public confidence in the nation’s financial system.
Trump celebrated the FTC ruling as “historic,” calling it one of the most significant expansions of presidential power in a century. He dismissed the Federal Reserve setback as procedural and vowed to continue seeking Cook’s removal.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented in the FTC case, warning that the majority had moved the country closer to an “imperial presidency.” Supporters of the ruling, including America First Legal, said the decision restored a basic constitutional principle: officials exercising executive power must answer to the elected president.
Copyright 1999-2026 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
[worthy_plugins_news_story_title]
<div style="text-align:right; padding:0px 0px 10px 15px; float:right; width:300px;"><img src="[worthy_plugins_news_story_image name=sm_medium]" alt="" /></div>[worthy_plugins_news_story_body]