by Emmitt Barry, Worthy News Washington D.C. Bureau Chief
(Worthy News) – A federal judge in Texas has rejected a proposed agreement between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and several Christian ministries that would have limited enforcement of restrictions on political speech from the pulpit—marking a significant moment in the ongoing debate over religious liberty and free expression.
In National Religious Broadcasters et al. v. Scott Bessent et al., U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker ruled Tuesday that the court lacked jurisdiction to approve the agreement, citing longstanding federal statutes including the Tax Anti-Injunction Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act.
The case centers on the Johnson Amendment, a 1954 provision that prohibits tax-exempt nonprofit organizations, including churches, from endorsing political candidates. Christian groups have increasingly challenged the law, arguing it places an unconstitutional burden on pastors and ministries seeking to address moral and civic issues from a biblical perspective.
Judge Barker emphasized that even though both the IRS and the plaintiffs supported the agreement, jurisdiction cannot be established by mutual consent. He noted that federal courts are barred from granting relief in matters directly tied to tax enforcement.
The plaintiffs—including National Religious Broadcasters and several churches—had sought to block enforcement of the Johnson Amendment, asserting that it infringes on First Amendment rights. While the IRS had previously indicated it would not penalize churches for certain political expressions, the court declined to formalize that position.
Reaction from conservative Christian leaders was swift. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, criticized the ruling, calling it a missed opportunity to defend religious freedom during a milestone year in American history. He confirmed that the plaintiffs intend to appeal the decision to the Fifth Circuit.
On the other side, Rachel Laser of Americans United for Separation of Church and State praised the ruling, arguing it preserves the integrity of nonprofit tax law and prevents politicization of religious institutions.
For many faith leaders, the case highlights a deeper concern: whether churches can speak freely on issues of national importance without fear of government reprisal. As the legal battle heads toward appeal, it is likely to remain a defining issue at the intersection of faith, law, and the future of free speech in America.
Copyright 1999-2026 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
The following code is how the above article is generated with the Worthy Suite WordPress Plugin.
[worthy_plugins_news_story_body]This is how you display a story with an image.
Federal Judge Blocks IRS Deal Shielding Churches on Political Speech
by Emmitt Barry, Worthy News Washington D.C. Bureau Chief
(Worthy News) – A federal judge in Texas has rejected a proposed agreement between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and several Christian ministries that would have limited enforcement of restrictions on political speech from the pulpit—marking a significant moment in the ongoing debate over religious liberty and free expression.
In National Religious Broadcasters et al. v. Scott Bessent et al., U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker ruled Tuesday that the court lacked jurisdiction to approve the agreement, citing longstanding federal statutes including the Tax Anti-Injunction Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act.
The case centers on the Johnson Amendment, a 1954 provision that prohibits tax-exempt nonprofit organizations, including churches, from endorsing political candidates. Christian groups have increasingly challenged the law, arguing it places an unconstitutional burden on pastors and ministries seeking to address moral and civic issues from a biblical perspective.
Judge Barker emphasized that even though both the IRS and the plaintiffs supported the agreement, jurisdiction cannot be established by mutual consent. He noted that federal courts are barred from granting relief in matters directly tied to tax enforcement.
The plaintiffs—including National Religious Broadcasters and several churches—had sought to block enforcement of the Johnson Amendment, asserting that it infringes on First Amendment rights. While the IRS had previously indicated it would not penalize churches for certain political expressions, the court declined to formalize that position.
Reaction from conservative Christian leaders was swift. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, criticized the ruling, calling it a missed opportunity to defend religious freedom during a milestone year in American history. He confirmed that the plaintiffs intend to appeal the decision to the Fifth Circuit.
On the other side, Rachel Laser of Americans United for Separation of Church and State praised the ruling, arguing it preserves the integrity of nonprofit tax law and prevents politicization of religious institutions.
For many faith leaders, the case highlights a deeper concern: whether churches can speak freely on issues of national importance without fear of government reprisal. As the legal battle heads toward appeal, it is likely to remain a defining issue at the intersection of faith, law, and the future of free speech in America.
Copyright 1999-2026 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
[worthy_plugins_news_story_title]
<div style="text-align:right; padding:0px 0px 10px 15px; float:right; width:300px;"><img src="[worthy_plugins_news_story_image name=sm_medium]" alt="" /></div>[worthy_plugins_news_story_body]